• Upgrade your defenses, not your anxiety. Let’s Talk! Contact Us
The Crucial Role of Forensic Science in the Legal System

The Crucial Role of Forensic Science in the Legal System

You’ve probably heard of forensic science in crime shows... but do you know how it really works?

It’s not just lab coats and microscopes—it’s the reason many crimes finally get solved. Most people don’t realize how powerful forensic science actually is. So if you're even a little curious, buckle up. You're about to discover some seriously cool stuff.

Forensic science in general terms refers to use of scientific knowledge and techniques to help criminal justice system. Forensic science connects suspects to crimes by means of scientific methods or extricate innocents. Forensic science plays a crucial role in the legal system by providing scientific analysis and evidence that can be used in criminal and civil cases.

Beginning from 1897 with establishment of India’s first fingerprint bureau in Kolkata (which become operational in 1904) by two officers namely Azizul Haque and Hem Chandra Bose, the rise of Forensic science began in India. Since then, Forensic science is widely used for delivering justice. The India’s forensic establishment consists of 7 central forensic laboratories along with numerous state forensic laboratories, state fingerprint bureaus, DNA fingerprinting labs, regional forensic labs and mobile forensic units.


Key Takeaways:

Forensic science connects scientific evidence with justice.

Plays a critical role in crime scene analysis, evidence processing, and courtroom testimony.

New laws in India have made forensic investigation mandatory in major criminal cases.

India needs more trained forensic experts and better-equipped labs for smoother justice delivery.


If we talk about current period, the Forensic is not just a science. It also comprises of other disciplines like arts, commerce, engineering etc. The major branches of forensic science include the following techniques:

o Forensic Biology: The forensic biology uses the standard biological methods to identify individual through analysis of biological trace evidence available at crime scene. It includes identification through body fluids such as blood, saliva, semen, urine etc. and other materials like hair, skin samples, diatoms etc.

o Forensic Odontology: Forensic odontology uses the dental records such as jawline alignment, teeth, general mouth structure etc. to identify individuals. In cases like sexual assault or rapes the bite marks are crucial evidence to identify individuals. And in cases like mass disaster, or cases where body is decomposed then the identity can be established by forensic odontology.

o Forensic Toxicology: Toxicology analyses the biological samples like blood, stomach and its contents, liver, spleen etc. To look for any medicine or toxic substance to identify cause of death. Sometimes it helps to identify whether person has consumed exceeded amount of drug than allowable. This is one of the most evolving fields because more advanced drug variations are being created day by day.

o Forensic Anthropology: The forensic anthropology uses the examination of skeletal remains for identification of individual through age, gender, race etc. The injury marks (if present) on skeletal remains sometimes helps to determine cause of death and bones helpful in identifying the approximate time of death.

o Forensic Medicine: This field uses medical knowledge for the purpose of law. Main duty of forensic medicine expert (generally called pathologist) is to conduct autopsy of dead body to determine cause of death, mode of death, time and to examine injuries and wounds. Forensic pathologist also conducts examination of internal organs to find any toxic or poisonous material. The forensic experts determine the degree of assault in rapes and sexual assault cases.

o Forensic Document Examination: The Forensic document examiner conducts analysis of documents whose authenticity is questioned. This field includes handwriting analysis, signature examination, typewritten document analysis, ink analysis etc to establish genuineness of documents or handwriting. The forensic expert use wide range of techniques to examine over writings, alterations in documents.

Learn more about Document Forensics Services


o Digital Forensics: Digital forensics science is a branch of forensic science that focuses on the recovery and investigation of material found in digital devices related to cybercrime. Digital forensics includes computer or mobile forensics, deals with investigating and recovering digital evidence from electronic devices and networks.

Learn more about Digital Forensics Services


o Audio-Video Forensic: Audio Forensics is the branch of multimedia forensics that deals with the acquisition, analysis, and evaluation of sound recordings that may ultimately be presented as admissible evidence in a court of law, the audio forensic expert evaluates the recordings, check its authenticity, comparison etc.

Video Forensics is also a branch of multimedia forensics that deals with evaluation, examination and enhancement of video footage in legal matters. Videos are another crucial type of digital media in multimedia forensics. Forensic analysis of video involves examining video files, determine origin, detect tampering or editing, and extract relevant information.

“Learn more about Audio Video Forensics Services


o DNA: DNA fingerprinting is the most advanced and most used technique for identification of an individual these days. Experts use biological samples from crime scene to extract DNA and each sample has unique DNA fingerprint. This technique helps to identify individual by his DNA makeup. In recent times another technology called touch DNA also evolved which can collect DNA from where a person touches or comes in contact.

“Learn more about DNA Forensics Services


o Narcotics: This branch uses chemical-based tests to identify narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances collected from crime scenes or raids. Experts in this field work to detect even trace amounts of illegal substances. Their findings play a crucial role in cracking down on drug-related crimes and supporting legal proceedings.


o Ballistics: Forensic ballistics is a branch of forensic science that applies forensic principles to study bullets and firearms. It involves analysis of toolmarks, bullets, bullet shells, firearms to establish connection between bullet and firearms. The forensic ballistics also include examination of gunshot residue to determine range of fire.


o Psychology: Forensic psychology is a field that combines the practice of psychology and the law by utilizing psychological expertise. Forensic psychology may encompass evaluating competency to stand trial, making sentencing recommendations, offering expert testimony, performing child custody evaluations, participating in jury selection, and providing psychotherapy to criminal offenders. The new psychological techniques like brain mapping and polygraph test are also conducted to interview witnesses or suspects. A technique called criminal profiling is based on the psychology of the offender. Based on his modus operandi the forensic psychologists make a profile of offender which helps police in investigation.


o Fingerprints: Fingerprint analysis involves comparing chance prints with suspected prints to identify suspects. It helps investigators to link one crime to another crime if same person is involved. Fingerprint identification also helps investigators to track a criminal record, previous arrest or convictions.

Learn more about Fingerprint Forensics Services




Role of Forensic science in Legal System


1. Crime Scene Investigation:

The first and most important phase in any investigation. In crime scene investigation the experts systematically examine crime scene and collect crucial evidence and document them. The crime scene investigation has various types of search methods (ex. Zonal method, Strip method, Grid method, Spiral method etc.) which are used to search crime scene to collect evidence. The experts identify and collect various types of evidence like biological samples, weapons, fingerprints, footprints for further examination. The main objective of this phase is to maintain chain of custody and integrity of evidence. After collection of evidence the crime scene investigators conduct the crime scene reconstruction to understand the sequences of events and circumstances regarding offence.

Recently after the scraping of old laws IPC, CrPC and IEA, the new law Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (previously CrPC) states that forensic investigation is now mandatory for offences punishable by at least seven years of imprisonment, ensuring that forensic experts collect and record evidence at crime scenes. If a state lacks a forensics facility, it shall use the facility in another state.


2. Identification and analysis of evidence:

Forensic evidence once collected are forwarded to forensic laboratories, analysis and individualization of forensic evidence play a very crucial role in criminal justice system. The scientific reports enable law enforcement authority to link accused with crime precisely. The precision and reliability of these methods contribute significantly to building strong cases within courts. By examining the biological and physical evidence experts help in increased conviction rate and to relieve the innocent. The intersection of technology and forensic expertise in identification and individualization underscores the transformative impact of forensic science on investigative processes within the criminal justice system. The forensic pathologists conduct autopsies to determine time, cause and mode of death of deceased. By examining the internal organs, tissues, injuries, wounds etc. they determine the cause of death. In cases of suspected poisoning, they carry out examination of internal organs to find the toxic substances. 

The experts use advanced techniques and equipment's to test evidence and provide report. The advanced techniques like DNA profiling, automated fingerprint identification system, gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy, HPLC, superimposition helps to analyze evidence accurately.


3. Expert witness:

According to newly introduced laws under section 39 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Opinions of Third Persons When Relevant: This section establishes that when the court needs to form an opinion on matters like foreign law, science, art, identity verification, or handwriting and fingerprint impressions, the opinions of individuals especially skilled in those respective fields are considered relevant.

According to laws a person who is qualified, experienced and recognized by courts are called expert witness! He should have the adequate knowledge, experience, training and expertise over that subject to be called as the expert. The reports provided by experts in courts are considered as relevant only when he provides expert opinion in courts, and expert opinions must sustain in cross-examination.

It is very important phase of criminal justice system due to the fact that experts have to present their findings before court and juries. The expert needs to express his complex scientific principles into easier and more understandable way to help the legal system. The integrity of expert opinion is a very important because it determines the outcome of the case.


4. Research and development:

Forensic science is a dynamic field, with rise in technology and science the criminals are also finding more and more methods to commit offences and escape from law. So, it is duty of forensic experts to be one step ahead of offenders to ensure the smooth functioning of legal system. The forensic professional always tries to conduct research on new technologies and methods that are developed in forensic science and other scientific techniques that can be used in forensic field. The focus should be on to improve analytical techniques and enhance the accuracy of current technologies.

Another major problem nowadays is the rise of digital equipment's which eventually given rise to digital and cybercrimes. The forensic experts are required to be well familiar with modern devices and their potential threats. So, the experts must ensure they have all the necessary tools and techniques to be in toe to toe with modern day offenders.


Challenges Faced by Forensic Science in India

As a scientific method the forensics is a gift to legal system, on the other hand it has some flaws or shortcomings. Justice system needs to overcome these flaws to ensure justice is served. There is a need to see that the investigative agencies have adequate knowledge of forensic as they are the first to approach a crime scene. It needs to be noted that our forensic laboratories are understaffed and that is the reason why many cases are still pending in courts due to lack of forensic evidence. The authority needs to look after this to ensure smooth running of criminal justice system.

Along with that the police officials are required to provide crucial and basic forensic training to conduct crime scene investigation because in much cases evidence are lost due to improper handling. Recently the Karnataka government appointed scene of crime officers to collect evidence from crime scenes. The union home minister announced that India needs approximately 90,000 forensic experts in 5 years to visit crime scenes and collect forensic evidence.


Conclusion

Forensic science has very vast scope in context of Indian legal system. There is a saying that ‘1000 culprits can escape but one innocent should not be punished’. Forensic science ensures that culprits will be punished, and innocents will be relived. The role of forensic in legal system is to convict the offender and release innocents. Forensic science is helpful in transparent and legal judicial system it enhances the legal system by guaranteeing that judgments are rendered with a complete awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the available evidence. Minimizing these errors also depends on strict quality controls and ongoing advancements in forensic procedures, thereby enhancing the credibility and accuracy of forensic results.

Forensic science is the backbone of modern justice, to ensure timely and fair judgments, India must invest in training, lab infrastructure, and forensic literacy among law enforcement. With forensic investigation now mandatory in serious crimes, it’s time for India to strengthen this scientific pillar of its justice system.

Source – Internet


1. What is forensic science?

 Forensic science is the application of scientific methods and techniques to investigate crimes and assist the legal system by analyzing evidence.

2. How did forensic science begin in India?

It began with the establishment of India’s first fingerprint bureau in Kolkata in 1897, which became operational in 1904.

3. What are the major branches of forensic science?

Some key branches include:

Forensic Biology

Forensic Toxicology

Digital Forensics

DNA Fingerprinting

Forensic Document Examination

Forensic Psychology

Ballistics

Narcotics Analysis

Forensic Odontology

Audio-Video Forensics

Forensic Anthropology

Fingerprint Analysis

4. Why is forensic science important in the legal system?

It helps in solving crimes by linking suspects to crime scenes, providing scientific testimony in court, and ensuring that innocent people are not wrongfully punished.

5. Are forensic investigations now mandatory in India?

Yes, under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), forensic investigation is mandatory for crimes punishable by 7 years or more.

6. What does a forensic expert do at a crime scene?

They collect, preserve, and document evidence, reconstruct the crime scene, and ensure chain of custody is maintained.

7. What is an expert witness in forensic science?

An expert witness is a qualified forensic professional who provides their opinion in court based on scientific analysis of evidence.

8. What are the challenges faced by forensic science in India?

Shortage of trained forensic experts

Under-equipped forensic labs

Delay in evidence processing

Lack of forensic awareness among investigating officers

9. How many forensic experts does India need?

According to the Union Home Minister, India requires around 90,000 forensic experts in the next five years.

10. Can forensic science be used in civil cases too?

Yes, forensic science is used in both criminal and civil cases, including document verification, DNA paternity testing, and fraud investigations.


Why Choose Proaxis Solutions for Your Forensic Needs?

When accuracy, trust, and legal credibility matter most, Proaxis Solutions stands as the preferred forensic partner across India.


People also searched for: Best forensic lab in Bangalore | Fingerprint forensics services | Digital forensics services | Private forensic lab in Bangalore | Forensic labs near me | Top fingerprinting services in Bangalore | Document authentication services in Bangalore | PCC verification in Bangalore

Search
Popular categories
Latest blogs
Certified Digital Evidence under Section 63(4)(c) Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)
Certified Digital Evidence under Section 63(4)(c) Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)
Why forensic certification is now the backbone of court-admissible digital proof in IndiaDigital evidence no longer plays a supporting role in Indian investigations - it defines outcomes. From mobile phones and CCTV footage to emails, cloud logs, and social media content, courts today rely heavily on electronic records. But reliance alone is not enough. What matters is how that evidence is collected, preserved, examined, and certified.With the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) replacing the Indian Evidence Act, the spotlight has shifted firmly onto Section 63(4)(c) - the provision that governs certification of electronic evidence. For investigators, enterprises, and litigators, this section is not a procedural formality. It is the difference between evidence that convinces and evidence that collapses under cross-examination. This blog unpacks Section 63(4)(c) from a forensic examiner’s perspective, explains what courts expect today, and shows why professional digital and multimedia forensic certification has become indispensable.Why Section 63(4)(c) matters more than everUnder the earlier regime, electronic evidence frequently failed in court—not because it was irrelevant, but because it was poorly certified. Screenshots without provenance, pen drives without integrity checks, videos without authentication—these gaps gave defence teams ample room to challenge admissibility.Section 63(4)(c) BSA tightens the framework.In simple terms, it requires that electronic records produced as evidence must be accompanied by a proper certificate, confirming: How the electronic record was produced The device or system involved That the record is a true and accurate representation That integrity was maintained throughout From a forensic standpoint, this is not paperwork. It is a technical declaration backed by methodology.Why courts actually test in certified electronic evidenceMany assume certification is about signing a document. In reality, courts examine the process behind the certificate.Here’s what judges and opposing counsel typically probe:Source authenticityWas the evidence extracted from the original device or system, or from a forwarded copy?Forensic best practice demands bit-by-bit acquisition using validated tools—not screen recording or file copy.Chain of custodyCan you demonstrate who handled the evidence, when, where, and how?Any unexplained gap weakens credibility.Integrity validationWere hash values generated and preserved?A certified electronic record without cryptographic hashes is increasingly viewed as incomplete.Examiner competenceWas the certificate issued by a qualified forensic expert who understands digital artefacts, metadata, compression, and system behaviour?This is where ad-hoc IT handling fails under scrutiny.Digital evidence is fragile - multimedia evidence even more soUnlike physical evidence, digital and multimedia artefacts are easily altered - often unintentionally.Consider common scenarios seen in investigations: CCTV footage exported without preserving original codecs Audio files re-saved during “clarity enhancement” WhatsApp chats forwarded instead of extracted Emails printed without header analysis From a forensic lens, these actions change artefact behaviour, metadata, or encoding structure—making certification under Section 63(4)(c) vulnerable.Professional multimedia forensics addresses this by: Working on forensic images, never originals Documenting every transformation step Preserving native formats and timestamps Explaining limitations transparently in reports Courts value this honesty far more than over-confident claims.Who should issue the Section 63(4)(c) certificate?This is where many cases stumble.The law allows certification by a person occupying a responsible official position related to the operation of the device or system. But in contested matters, courts increasingly favour certificates issued by independent forensic experts.Why?Because a forensic examiner can: Defend the methodology under cross-examination Explain technical artefacts in plain legal language Correlate digital evidence with timelines and events Testify without organisational bias For enterprises, banks, law firms, and government agencies, relying on internal IT teams alone is a growing risk - especially in high-value or criminal litigation.Forensic workflow aligned with Section 63(4)(c)From a practitioner’s standpoint, compliant certification follows a disciplined workflow: Evidence identificationDevices, storage media, cloud sources, or multimedia files are scoped precisely. Forensic acquisitionIndustry-standard tools are used to create verifiable forensic images. Hash verificationIntegrity is mathematically locked before and after examination. Examination & analysisArtefacts such as logs, metadata, deleted data, or frame-level video details are analysed. DocumentationEvery step is logged—tools used, versions, timestamps, and outcomes. Certification under Section 63(4)(c)The certificate reflects facts, not assumptions, and maps directly to the examined artefacts. This is the foundation of court-ready digital evidence.Why Section 63(4)(c) is a turning point for Indian litigationThe introduction of BSA signals a clear judicial expectation: Digital evidence must now meet forensic standards, not convenience standards.This has direct implications for: Cybercrime investigations Financial fraud and insider trading cases IP theft and data leakage disputes Employment and POSH inquiries Ransomware and incident response matters In all these cases, uncertified or poorly certified electronic records are no longer “conditionally acceptable.” They are actively questioned.What organisations should be searching for todayIf you are responsible for evidence, compliance, or litigation readiness, these are the questions you should be asking (and searching): Is our electronic evidence admissible in Indian courts? Do we have Section 63(4)(c) compliant certification? Can our digital evidence withstand cross-examination? Are our CCTV, audio, and video files forensically preserved? Who can issue an independent forensic certificate? These are not future concerns. They are current legal risks.Where Proaxis Solutions fits inAt Proaxis Solutions, digital and multimedia forensics is not treated as a technical service—it is treated as legal enablement.Our forensic teams work with:Digital forensics: computers, mobiles, servers, cloud artefactsMultimedia forensics: CCTV, audio recordings, video files, imagesCertified electronic evidence aligned to Section 63(4)(c) BSACourt-defensible reports and expert testimony supportEvery engagement is designed around one question:Will this evidence survive judicial scrutiny?If the answer is not a confident yes, the process is re-examined.Frequently Asked Questions1. What is certified electronic evidence under Section 63(4)(c) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam?Certified electronic evidence under Section 63(4)(c) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam refers to digital records that are accompanied by a formal certificate confirming their authenticity, source, and integrity. The certification verifies how the electronic record was produced, the device or system involved, and confirms that the data has not been altered, making it admissible in Indian courts. 2. Who is authorised to issue a Section 63(4)(c) certificate for electronic evidence in India?A Section 63(4)(c) certificate can be issued by a person in a responsible official position related to the operation or management of the device or system that produced the electronic record. In contested or high-risk cases, independent digital forensic experts are preferred, as they can technically justify the extraction, analysis, and integrity of the evidence during cross-examination. 3. Is forensic examination mandatory for electronic evidence to be admissible in court?Forensic examination is not explicitly mandatory, but in practice, courts increasingly expect electronic evidence to be supported by forensic procedures. Digital forensics ensures proper acquisition, hash verification, chain of custody, and technical documentation—elements that significantly strengthen the validity of a Section 63(4)(c) certificate and reduce the risk of evidence being challenged. 4. How has the Section 65B certificate changed under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam?The Section 65B certificate under the Indian Evidence Act has now been substantively replaced by Section 63(4)(c) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). While the legal intent remains the same -establishing the authenticity and admissibility of electronic evidence - Section 63(4)(c) expands the focus to include forensic integrity, system reliability, and accurate reproduction of electronic records. This shift reflects modern digital forensics practices and places greater emphasis on proper acquisition, hash validation, and expert-backed certification rather than mere procedural compliance. 5. Why do courts reject electronic evidence despite having a Section 63(4)(c) certificate?Courts may reject electronic evidence even with a Section 63(4)(c) certificate if there are gaps in chain of custody, missing hash values, unclear acquisition methods, or lack of forensic documentation. Certificates unsupported by proper digital or multimedia forensic examination often fail under cross-examination, especially in cybercrime, fraud, and commercial litigation cases.Evidence is only as strong as its certificationIn today’s legal environment, discovering digital evidence is not enough.Collecting it is not enough.Even analysing it is not enough.Certification under Section 63(4)(c) is what transforms electronic data into legal truth.For organisations and investigators who want certainty - not assumptions - professional digital and multimedia forensics is no longer optional. It is foundational.Connect with Proaxis Solutions If you need clarity on whether your electronic or multimedia evidence is certified, compliant, and court-ready, connect with Proaxis Solutions to evaluate your evidence before it is tested in court.   
Digital Forensics Explained for Indian Enterprises: Why Evidence Matters After a Cyber Incident
Digital Forensics Explained for Indian Enterprises: Why Evidence Matters After a Cyber Incident
Cyber incidents are no longer rare IT disruptions. They are regulatory, legal, financial, and governance events.In India, when an organization suffers a cyber breach, the questions that follow are no longer limited to “How fast did we recover?” Regulators, auditors, legal teams, customers, and boards now ask a more fundamental question:What exactly happened - and can you prove it? This is where digital forensics becomes critical.What is Digital Forensics?Digital forensics is the structured and scientific process of identifying, preserving, analyzing, and presenting digital evidence so that it can stand up to regulatory scrutiny, audits, and legal examination.Unlike day-to-day IT troubleshooting or security monitoring, digital forensics is not about assumptions or quick fixes. It is about facts.A forensic investigation answers questions such as: How did the attacker gain access? When did the breach actually start? What systems and data were affected? Was data exfiltrated, altered, or destroyed? Can these findings be independently verified? For Indian enterprises operating under CERT-In directives, SEBI cyber resilience expectations, RBI guidelines, and contractual obligations, these answers are not optional - they are essential.Digital Forensics vs Incident Response: A Critical DifferenceOne of the most common and costly mistakes organizations make is treating incident response and digital forensics as the same function.They are not.Incident Response (IR)Incident response focuses on: Containing the attack Removing malicious activity Restoring systems and services Resuming business operations The primary objective of IR is speed and continuity.Digital Forensics (DF)Digital forensics focuses on: Evidence preservation Timeline reconstruction Root cause identification Impact assessment Defensible documentation The primary objective of forensics is truth and accountability. When recovery activities begin before evidence is preserved, critical data is often overwritten, altered, or lost. Logs roll over, systems are reimaged, endpoints are reset, and cloud artifacts disappear. Once this happens, no amount of post-facto analysis can reconstruct the full picture.Why Logs Alone Are Not EvidenceMany organizations believe that log data is sufficient to explain a cyber incident. In reality, logs are only one piece of forensic evidence, and often an incomplete one.Logs: May be tampered with by attackers Are often retained for limited durations Rarely provide full attacker context Do not establish intent or sequence on their own Digital forensics correlates logs with: Disk and memory artifacts Registry and system changes Email and identity activity Cloud access records Endpoint and network traces Only when these elements are analyzed together can an organization establish a reliable incident timeline.When is Digital Forensics Required in India?Digital forensics becomes mandatory or strongly advisable in several scenarios under Indian regulatory and legal expectations.1. CERT-In Reportable IncidentsCERT-In requires timely and accurate reporting of certain cyber incidents. Reporting without forensic validation often leads to: Incomplete disclosures Incorrect impact assessment Follow-up queries from regulators A forensic investigation ensures that incident reports are fact-based, defensible, and complete.2. Ransomware and Data BreachesRansomware incidents are rarely limited to encryption alone. In many cases: Data is exfiltrated before encryption Attackers maintain persistence Multiple systems are compromised silently Without forensics, organizations may underreport breach scope and miss notification obligations.3. Insider Threats and FraudIncidents involving employees, vendors, or privileged users require independent and unbiased investigation. Forensics provides objective evidence that can support: Disciplinary action Legal proceedings Insurance claims 4. Regulatory Audits and Legal Proceedings When incidents are reviewed by regulators, auditors, or courts, explanations are not enough. Evidence is required.The Forensic-First Investigation ApproachA professional digital forensic investigation follows a disciplined and documented methodology.1. Evidence Identification and PreservationThe first priority is identifying potential evidence sources and preserving them before remediation begins. This includes endpoints, servers, cloud workloads, email systems, and identity platforms.2. Chain of Custody DocumentationEvery piece of evidence must be documented: Where it came from Who handled it When it was accessed How integrity was maintained This is critical for legal defensibility.3. Timeline ReconstructionForensic analysts reconstruct events minute by minute: Initial access Lateral movement Privilege escalation Data access or exfiltration Persistence mechanisms4. Root Cause and Impact AnalysisBeyond what happened, forensics answers why it happened and what it affected. This supports risk remediation and governance decisions.5. Regulator- and Court-Ready ReportingFindings are documented in structured reports that can be reviewed by: Regulators Auditors Legal counsel Boards and senior management The goal is clarity, not technical jargon.Why Indian Enterprises Must Rethink Incident HandlingHistorically, cyber incidents were treated as operational IT issues. That approach no longer works.Today, poor incident handling can lead to: Regulatory penalties Audit qualifications Contractual disputes Insurance claim rejections Loss of stakeholder trust More importantly, organizations that cannot establish facts lose control of the narrative. External parties—regulators, customers, or the media—end up defining the incident for them. Digital forensics gives organizations back that control.The Role of Independent ForensicsIn many cases, internal IT or security teams are too close to the incident to conduct an unbiased investigation. Independent forensic specialists bring: Objectivity Specialized tools and methodologies Regulatory and legal awareness Experience across multiple incident types This independence is often crucial when incidents escalate beyond technical remediation.Digital Forensics as a Governance CapabilityForward-looking organizations are beginning to treat digital forensics not as a reactive service, but as a governance capability.This includes: Forensic-ready incident response plans Log retention aligned with forensic needs Clear escalation paths for investigations Regular tabletop exercises involving legal and compliance teams Such preparedness reduces chaos during real incidents and improves outcomes.Why Evidence Matters More Than EverIn cyber incidents: Beliefs don’t satisfy regulators Assumptions don’t protect organizations Speed without accuracy creates risk Evidence is what stands when everything else is questioned. Digital forensics ensures that organizations are not forced to guess, speculate, or defend incomplete narratives after an incident.How Proaxis Solutions Approaches Digital ForensicsProaxis Solutions provides specialized digital forensics and investigation services designed for Indian regulatory, legal, and enterprise environments.With experience across: Digital and cloud forensics Ransomware and malware investigations Email, endpoint, and network evidence analysis CERT-In aligned forensic reporting Court- and audit-ready documentation Proaxis Solutions focuses on facts, evidence integrity, and defensibility, not just technical recoveryFrequently Asked Questions (FAQs)Is digital forensics mandatory after a cyber incident in India?Digital forensics is not legally mandatory for every cyber incident, but it is strongly required for CERT-In reportable incidents, ransomware attacks, data breaches, insider threats, and cases involving regulatory, legal, or audit scrutiny. Forensics ensures accurate reporting and defensible findings.Can incident response be done without digital forensics?Yes, incident response can be performed without forensics, but doing so risks evidence loss, incomplete incident understanding, and regulatory non-compliance. Incident response focuses on recovery, while digital forensics focuses on evidence, timelines, and accountability.How quickly should digital forensics begin after a cyber incident?Digital forensics should begin immediately, ideally before remediation or system restoration starts. Early forensic involvement prevents evidence contamination and ensures critical artifacts such as logs, memory, and system states are preserved.Can internal IT or SOC teams perform digital forensics?Internal IT or SOC teams can assist with containment and recovery, but digital forensics requires specialized expertise, tools, and independent handling. Internal teams may unintentionally alter evidence or lack the legal and regulatory perspective required for defensible investigations.What happens if an organization skips digital forensics after a breach?Skipping digital forensics can lead to incorrect breach scope assessment, incomplete regulatory reporting, legal exposure, audit failures, and reputational damage. Without evidence-backed findings, organizations lose control of the incident narrative.Forensics Is No Longer OptionalCyber incidents are inevitable.Poorly handled investigations are not.For Indian enterprises, digital forensics is no longer a niche technical function - it is a critical pillar of cyber resilience, governance, and compliance.If your organization is preparing for audits, responding to a breach, or reassessing its cyber incident response strategy, a forensic-first approach is essential.Source: InternetReach out to us any time to get customized forensics solutions to fit your needs. Check out Our Google Reviews for a better understanding of our services and business.If you are looking for Digital Forensics Services in Bangalore, give us a call on +91 91089 68720 / +91 94490 68720.
CERT-In Directive Explained: Why Cyber Incidents in India Require a Forensic Investigation Report
CERT-In Directive Explained: Why Cyber Incidents in India Require a Forensic Investigation Report
 India’s digital ecosystem is growing at an unprecedented pace. With rapid cloud adoption, fintech innovation, SaaS expansion, and large-scale digital public infrastructure, cyber incidents are no longer exceptions - they are inevitable. What differentiates a resilient organization from a vulnerable one is how it responds after an incident occurs.The CERT-In Directive has fundamentally changed the way Indian organizations must handle cybersecurity incidents. It makes one thing very clear:Fixing the problem is not enough. You must investigate it.A cyber incident without a digital forensic investigation report is now a compliance risk, a legal exposure, and a business liability.This blog explains the CERT-In directive in simple terms, why forensic reporting is critical, and how Indian organizations should align their incident response strategy to avoid penalties, reputational damage, and repeat attacks.Understanding the CERT-In Directive CERT-In (Indian Computer Emergency Response Team) is the national authority responsible for responding to cybersecurity incidents under the Information Technology Act, 2000.Under the latest directive, organizations operating in India must: Report specific cyber incidents within 6 hours Maintain ICT logs for at least 180 days Provide logs and investigation data to CERT-In on demand Preserve evidence related to cyber incidents This applies to: Enterprises and MSMEs Cloud service providers Data centers and VPN providers Fintech, healthcare, IT/ITES, and e-commerce companies The directive shifts the focus from reactive fixing to structured investigation and accountability. The Common Mistake: “We Fixed It, So We’re Done”After a cyber incident, many organizations focus on: Blocking the compromised account Rebuilding the affected server Resetting passwords Applying patches While these steps are necessary, they are incomplete.From CERT-In’s perspective, the following questions still remain unanswered: How did the attacker gain access? When did the breach actually start? What systems, data, or credentials were affected? Was it an external attack or an insider threat? Are there persistence mechanisms still active? Is the organization at risk of recurrence? Without a forensic investigation report, you cannot answer these questions - and CERT-In can demand those answers. Why CERT-In Expects a Forensic Report, Not Just a Technical Fix1. To Establish the Root Cause of the IncidentA fix addresses the symptom. A forensic investigation identifies the root cause.Example: Fix: Disable a compromised VPN account Forensics: Determine whether credentials were phished, brute-forced, reused, or stolen via malware CERT-In expects organizations to understand how the incident happened, not just where it was noticed. 2. To Determine the True Impact of the BreachMany breaches go undetected for weeks or months.A forensic report helps establish: Initial point of compromise Lateral movement across systems Data accessed, altered, or exfiltrated Logs showing attacker activity timeline This is critical for: Regulatory disclosure Customer notification Legal defense  3. To Preserve Digital EvidenceCERT-In directives align closely with legal and law enforcement expectations.A proper forensic investigation ensures: Evidence integrity (hash values, chain of custody) Non-tampering of logs and systems Documentation suitable for courts and regulators Ad-hoc fixes often destroy evidence, creating compliance and legal risk. 4. To Prove Due Diligence and ComplianceIn the event of: CERT-In audits Sectoral regulator scrutiny (RBI, SEBI, IRDAI) Cyber insurance claims Legal disputes A forensic report demonstrates: Timely incident response Structured investigation Responsible data handling This can significantly reduce penalties and liability. What a CERT-In-Aligned Forensic Report Should IncludeA professional cyber forensic investigation report typically covers:Incident Overview Date and time of detection Systems affected Nature of the incident Scope of Investigation Servers, endpoints, cloud workloads Network devices Logs analyzed Technical Findings Entry vector and attack path Compromised accounts or services Indicators of compromise (IOCs) Malware or tools identified Timeline Reconstruction Initial compromise Privilege escalation Lateral movement Data access or exfiltration Impact Assessment Data affected Business systems impacted Risk to customers or partners Remediation & Recommendations Security gaps identified Preventive controls suggested Monitoring improvements This level of documentation is what CERT-In expects - not a brief incident closure note. Log Retention and Forensics: A Critical ConnectionCERT-In mandates 180-day log retention for a reason.Without historical logs: Forensic timelines collapse Attack paths remain unclear Incident scope gets underestimated Key logs required for forensic readiness include: Firewall and VPN logs Authentication and access logs Server and database logs Cloud audit trails Endpoint security logs Organizations without centralized logging often struggle to comply during an investigation. Industries at Higher Risk of CERT-In ScrutinyWhile the directive applies broadly, enforcement risk is higher for: IT & ITES companies handling overseas data Fintech and BFSI organizations Healthcare and pharma companies Cloud service providers and SaaS platforms Data centers and managed service providers For these sectors, a missing forensic report after an incident can quickly escalate into a regulatory issue. Forensic Readiness: Preparing Before the IncidentThe smartest organizations don’t wait for a breach to think about forensics.They invest in: Incident response playbooks Centralized log management Forensic-ready system configurations Expert-led investigation support This ensures that when an incident occurs: Evidence is preserved Reporting timelines are met Business disruption is minimized  Why “Quick Fixes” Can Make Things WorseIronically, rushed remediation can: Destroy volatile evidence Alert attackers still present in the network Mask deeper compromise Lead to repeat incidents CERT-In investigations often reveal that the second breach happens because the first one was never fully understood.Final Thoughts: Compliance, Trust, and Long-Term SecurityThe CERT-In directive is not just a regulatory burden - it is a maturity benchmark.Organizations that treat cyber incidents as: “IT issues” → struggle with compliance “Risk and forensic events” → build long-term resilience  A forensic investigation report is no longer optional in India’s cybersecurity landscape. It is essential for: Regulatory compliance Legal protection Customer trust Sustainable security posture If your incident response strategy ends with a fix, it’s incomplete.If it ends with a forensic report, it’s defensible.At Proaxis Solutions, we believe a cyber incident is not just a technical disruption - it is a moment that tests an organization’s governance, accountability, and preparedness. Under the CERT-In directive, closing a ticket or restoring a system is only half the responsibility. What truly matters is understanding how the breach occurred, what was impacted, and whether your organization can defend itself against recurrence.Our digital forensics and incident response expertise helps organizations across India move beyond quick fixes to defensible, regulator-ready outcomes. Through structured forensic investigations, evidence-preserving methodologies, and CERT-In–aligned reporting, Proaxis Solutions ensures your incident response stands up to regulatory scrutiny, legal review, and board-level oversight. In today’s threat landscape, resilience is built on clarity - not assumptions. And clarity begins with forensics.
All blogs